Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Stub"
From ApCoCoAWiki
m (fixing a link) |
Andraschko (talk | contribs) m (page moved) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
hm, I thought all articles using the stub template would be listed here now. | hm, I thought all articles using the stub template would be listed here now. | ||
| − | the interesting question is, that looking for a stub article (e.g. [[HowTo:Read Matrices]]) it shows the article as element of the cartegory | + | the interesting question is, that looking for a stub article (e.g. [[CoCoA:HowTo:Read Matrices|HowTo:Read Matrices]]) it shows the article as element of the cartegory |
stub, while it is not listed in the cartegory as one of its articles (reasonable if you think about the way creating that list... probably scanning all articles for the corresponding tag, but not scanning for template tags being in that category. | stub, while it is not listed in the cartegory as one of its articles (reasonable if you think about the way creating that list... probably scanning all articles for the corresponding tag, but not scanning for template tags being in that category. | ||
Latest revision as of 09:19, 29 October 2020
hm, I thought all articles using the stub template would be listed here now. the interesting question is, that looking for a stub article (e.g. HowTo:Read Matrices) it shows the article as element of the cartegory stub, while it is not listed in the cartegory as one of its articles (reasonable if you think about the way creating that list... probably scanning all articles for the corresponding tag, but not scanning for template tags being in that category.
anyhow, i'd say it is a kind of bug, isn't it?
dheldt 09:32, 15 Sep 2005 (CEST)
- Hhm, why would you classify an article like QuotientBasis a stub, since it contains plenty of material. A stub is an article placeholder that needs material added to it. Am I missing something? Mabshoff 10:30, 15 Sep 2005 (CEST)
- I'd planned to add more information, e.g. more examples, remarks about theoretic background (like maccauly's theorem), etc. i think you can make it still a lot better, so there's still quite something missing. we should somehow discuss a kind of 'level' or 'border' for stubs... dheldt 10:34, 15 Sep 2005 (CEST)
- Ok, thanks for clarifing. Mabshoff 10:42, 15 Sep 2005 (CEST)
