Difference between revisions of "CoCoA:Example c8"
From ApCoCoAWiki
(add results for c8) |
(→c8_h: add benchmarks for CVS-2006-04-27) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==c8_h== | ==c8_h== | ||
| − | Computed in | + | Computed in 104.255 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27. Statistics: |
Poly in Basis 455 | Poly in Basis 455 | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Older benchmarks: | Older benchmarks: | ||
| + | * 0.95CVS-2006-04-15: 109.779 seconds on hilbert. | ||
* 0.95CVS-2006-04-08: 108.091 seconds on hilbert. | * 0.95CVS-2006-04-08: 108.091 seconds on hilbert. | ||
* 0.95CVS-2006-03-21: 117.739 seconds on hilbert. | * 0.95CVS-2006-03-21: 117.739 seconds on hilbert. | ||
Revision as of 23:25, 27 April 2006
Description
homogenized cyclic 8
c8_h
Computed in 104.255 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27. Statistics:
Poly in Basis 455 Pairs Reduced 2220 = (2212+8 Gens) of which 455 useful and 1765 useless Pairs Inserted 103285 + 8 generators of which 2220 survived of which GMKilled 100146 of which CopKilled 907 of which BKilled 20 GM considered pairs 397590 Back considered pairs 170276
Older benchmarks:
- 0.95CVS-2006-04-15: 109.779 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2006-04-08: 108.091 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2006-03-21: 117.739 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2006-03-15: 110.34 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2006-03-14: 103.462 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2005-12-31: 103.646 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2005-12-18: 103.806 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2005-11-23: 103.458 seconds on hilbert.
c8_hQ
Computed in 1231 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-03-15.
c8_hL
Computed in 15495 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-03-15.
c8_hQL
No results yet - currently running.
