Difference between revisions of "CoCoA:Example c8"
From ApCoCoAWiki
(→c8_h: add benchmarks for CVS-2006-04-27) |
(tidying up the wiki....) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==c8_hQ== | ==c8_hQ== | ||
− | Computed in | + | Computed in 887 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27. |
+ | |||
+ | Older benchmarks: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 0.95CVS-2006-03-15: 1231 seconds on hilbert. | ||
==c8_hL== | ==c8_hL== | ||
− | Computed in | + | Computed in 13927 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27. |
+ | |||
+ | Older benchmarks: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 0.95CVS-2006-03-15: 15495 seconds on hilbert. | ||
==c8_hQL== | ==c8_hQL== | ||
No results yet - currently running. | No results yet - currently running. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Benchmark]] |
Latest revision as of 07:27, 18 October 2007
Description
homogenized cyclic 8
c8_h
Computed in 104.255 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27. Statistics:
Poly in Basis 455 Pairs Reduced 2220 = (2212+8 Gens) of which 455 useful and 1765 useless Pairs Inserted 103285 + 8 generators of which 2220 survived of which GMKilled 100146 of which CopKilled 907 of which BKilled 20 GM considered pairs 397590 Back considered pairs 170276
Older benchmarks:
- 0.95CVS-2006-04-15: 109.779 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2006-04-08: 108.091 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2006-03-21: 117.739 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2006-03-15: 110.34 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2006-03-14: 103.462 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2005-12-31: 103.646 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2005-12-18: 103.806 seconds on hilbert.
- 0.95CVS-2005-11-23: 103.458 seconds on hilbert.
c8_hQ
Computed in 887 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27.
Older benchmarks:
- 0.95CVS-2006-03-15: 1231 seconds on hilbert.
c8_hL
Computed in 13927 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27.
Older benchmarks:
- 0.95CVS-2006-03-15: 15495 seconds on hilbert.
c8_hQL
No results yet - currently running.