Difference between revisions of "CoCoA:Example c8"

From ApCoCoAWiki
(add results for c8)
 
(tidying up the wiki....)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
==c8_h==
 
==c8_h==
  
Computed in 109.779 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-15. Statistics:
+
Computed in 104.255 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27. Statistics:
  
 
  Poly in Basis  455
 
  Poly in Basis  455
Line 18: Line 18:
 
Older benchmarks:
 
Older benchmarks:
  
 +
* 0.95CVS-2006-04-15: 109.779 seconds on hilbert.
 
* 0.95CVS-2006-04-08: 108.091 seconds on hilbert.
 
* 0.95CVS-2006-04-08: 108.091 seconds on hilbert.
 
* 0.95CVS-2006-03-21: 117.739 seconds on hilbert.
 
* 0.95CVS-2006-03-21: 117.739 seconds on hilbert.
Line 28: Line 29:
 
==c8_hQ==
 
==c8_hQ==
  
Computed in 1231 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-03-15.
+
Computed in 887 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27.
 +
 
 +
Older benchmarks:
 +
 
 +
* 0.95CVS-2006-03-15: 1231 seconds on hilbert.
  
 
==c8_hL==
 
==c8_hL==
  
Computed in 15495 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-03-15.
+
Computed in 13927 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27.
 +
 
 +
Older benchmarks:
 +
 
 +
* 0.95CVS-2006-03-15: 15495 seconds on hilbert.
  
 
==c8_hQL==
 
==c8_hQL==
  
 
No results yet - currently running.
 
No results yet - currently running.
 +
 +
[[Category:Benchmark]]

Latest revision as of 07:27, 18 October 2007

Description

homogenized cyclic 8

c8_h

Computed in 104.255 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27. Statistics:

Poly in Basis  455
Pairs Reduced        2220 = (2212+8 Gens) of which 455 useful and 1765 useless
Pairs Inserted        103285 + 8 generators of which 2220 survived
  of which GMKilled     100146
  of which CopKilled    907
  of which BKilled      20
GM considered pairs   397590
Back considered pairs 170276

Older benchmarks:

  • 0.95CVS-2006-04-15: 109.779 seconds on hilbert.
  • 0.95CVS-2006-04-08: 108.091 seconds on hilbert.
  • 0.95CVS-2006-03-21: 117.739 seconds on hilbert.
  • 0.95CVS-2006-03-15: 110.34 seconds on hilbert.
  • 0.95CVS-2006-03-14: 103.462 seconds on hilbert.
  • 0.95CVS-2005-12-31: 103.646 seconds on hilbert.
  • 0.95CVS-2005-12-18: 103.806 seconds on hilbert.
  • 0.95CVS-2005-11-23: 103.458 seconds on hilbert.

c8_hQ

Computed in 887 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27.

Older benchmarks:

  • 0.95CVS-2006-03-15: 1231 seconds on hilbert.

c8_hL

Computed in 13927 seconds on hilbert with 0.95CVS-2006-04-27.

Older benchmarks:

  • 0.95CVS-2006-03-15: 15495 seconds on hilbert.

c8_hQL

No results yet - currently running.